On October 1, 2014, U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) posted a notice in the Federal Register seeking comments on all aspects of the recordkeeping requirements of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). In particular, BIS invites the public to submit comments on the following issues:
(1) How have the current recordkeeping requirements of the EAR positively or negatively affected organizations? Quantitative analyses on this topic would be beneficial.
(2) Are there any recordkeeping provisions or references to documents that are out of date? Are there provisions in the recordkeeping requirements that should be updated to take into account technological changes in how business is conducted and records are maintained?
(3) Should the recordkeeping provisions make transactional distinctions on when records should be created or maintained? For instance, should intangible transfers of technology or software be treated differently than tangible exports or reexports for record creation and record retention purposes? Or would it be preferable to avoid making distinctions in order to have more clear and concise requirements?
(4) Would be efficient to make a distinction in Part 762 between provisions that require the maintenance of records created in the ordinary course of business as opposed to those that require thecreation of records for export control purposes that would not otherwise be created in the ordinary course of business?
(5) Are there any record creation requirements in the EAR that should be reviewed or revised?
(6) Are there any recordkeeping requirements under U.S. or other law that would serve as good examples for the EAR?
Comments to BIS are due by December 1, 2014.