Laptop Searches Criticized at Senate Hearing

On June 25, 2008, the Senate Judiciary Committee (Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Property Rights) held a hearing on "Laptop Searches and Other Violations of Privacy Faced by Americans Returning from Overseas Travel." At the hearing, advocacy groups and some legal experts stated that it was unreasonable for federal officials to search the laptops of U.S. citizens when returning from traveling abroad.

In April, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
ruled that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) could conduct searches of electronic devices such as laptops without reasonable suspicion. Specifically, the court ruled that border control agents who found child porn on a traveler's laptop didn't violate the man's right to be free from unreasonable searches. Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain wrote, "We are satisfied that reasonable suspicion is not needed for customs officials to search a laptop or other personal electronic storage devices at the border." In 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld computer searches by border guard when a man drove from Canada to the U.S. with child porn on his computer.

As
reported by the New York Times:

“If you asked most Americans whether the government has the right to look through their luggage for contraband when they are returning from an overseas trip, they would tell you ‘yes, the government has that right,’ ” Senator Russ Feingold, Democrat of Wisconsin, said Wednesday at the hearing of a Senate Judiciary subcommittee.


“But,” Mr. Feingold continued, “if you asked them whether the government has a right to open their laptops, read their documents and e-mails, look at their photographs and examine the Web sites they have visited, all without any suspicion of wrongdoing, I think those same Americans would say that the government absolutely has no right to do that.”

The material on this site is protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America and international conventions, and is the exclusive property of Global Trade Expertise or any licensee. All rights reserved. © 2007 Global Trade Expertise Contact/Comments